The fresh new ? 2 sample shown no relationships between decades and you may ego advancement

All instructors about analysis had been specialized Enneagram teachers regarding the Story Community. This new Enneagram Circuit training Courses used four pri variety of boards, (2) didactic training, (3) meditation knowledge, and you will (4) experiential exploration. Enneagram Intense Trainings teachers used a plan entitled The Enneagram Rigorous®: Integrating Psychological Life and you can Heart.

The three Introductory courses integrated pri understanding strategies. The new Berkeley movement provided informal Enneagram sorts of panels and didactic understanding. New Minnesota movement made use of all four of one’s number 1 learning modalities. New Palo Alto way made use of Enneagram style of panels, didactic discovering, and you may experiential mining including directed visualization.

Data Studies

Surveys have been authored of the a research assistant and you will provided for an excellent Cook-Greuter-formal SCT scorer (Hy and you may Loevinger 1996) thru article mail. Password number were used so the rater are blind in order to the kind of sample, the new dates of your test, and training classification type. The scorer observed the education of the Susan Cook-Greuter, making use of the totally new Loevinger manual, apart from stems outside of the tips guide (Cook-Greuter 1999). Obtained answers was basically delivered back to the experts for the a stick out pass on sheet which was following useful for analysis data. To make sure reliability of scoring getting causes and therefore players went up or off 2 or more stages, a sample of those studies has also been obtained by the Cook-Greuter herself.

Overall performance

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed that there were no pre-existing ego development differences at baseline among the participants between the sites, F(8, 9) = 0.38, p = .93. The pretest and posttest ego development scores were significantly correlated (r = .48, p < .001), whereby participants with higher pre-training scores also had higher post-training scores.

Since there are much more avove the age of more youthful grownups in this shot, a diagnosis was used to check on the connection ranging from age bracket and you will education perception. In total, 40 users (33%, n = ) enhanced a minumum of one values following the degree. Proportionally, more fifty–59 season olds (45%, n = ) compared to the other a long time improved one or more degree after the training (20%, n = 1/5, significantly less than 30; 0%, n = 0/step 3, 30–39 seasons olds; 25%, n = 7/twenty-eight, 40–44 season olds; and you may 24%, letter = 8/33, 60+ year olds). To examine whether that it trend is statistically tall, an effective ? 2 sample off independence was computed of the researching many years category and you can whether a person knowledgeable pride phase improvement you to or even more grade following the intervention (or otherwise not).

A diagnosis has also been used to check on the relationship anywhere between fellow member sex and education effect. No matter if proportionally, way more females (36%, letter = ) than just people (18%, letter = 4/22) advanced no less than one stages following knowledge, an excellent ? dos shot regarding liberty found zero dating between gender and ego creativity.

Two repeated-measures ANOVAs were conducted to meetme dating website test for within-subject ego development changes across the training sites. The first model examined the interaction term of ego development by training site type as a dichotomous variable (intensive site vs. introductory site); the model was not significant at the p < .05 level, F(1,120) = 1.32, p = .25. The second model examined the interaction term of ego development by individual training site; the model was also not significant at the p < .05 level, F(7, 114) = 1.40, p = .21.

Paired sample t tests were conducted to examine whether there were significant changes in ego development scores before compared to after the Enneagram training interventions at each site. Data revealed that the Asheville 2005 participant group showed a significant increase in ego development scores following the intervention, t(22) = ? 3.36, p < .01. Table 4 sument scores and the paired t test results.